Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cabral, R. R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Chaves, A. C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cabral, R. R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Chaves, A. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Multi-family group intervention in a programme for patients with first-episode psychosis: a Brazilian experience.

Rita Regina Fabri Cabral and Ana Cristina Chaves*

First Psychosis Episode Programme, Psychiatry Department, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP-EPM), Brazil

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: anachaves{at}terra.com.br.


   Abstract

Background: Patients’ relatives are considered crucial for treatment and recovery in psychosis but family intervention studies have shown contradictory results in first-episode psychosis. The aims of this study were to survey caregivers’ satisfaction with the multi-family intervention delivered by our programme and to verify if knowledge acquisition about illness and treatment provided by the family intervention was considered enough and understandable.

Methods: Sixty five family members of 46 first-episode patients were invited to answer a satisfaction questionnaire about the intervention.

Results: Forty individuals returned the questionnaire: 31 women (77.5%) and nine men (22.5%). Most (82.5%) had daily contact with the patient and 19 (47.5%) were mothers. Regarding knowledge acquisition, approximately one third did not improve their understanding of the illness. Nonetheless, 90% of the participants believed the meetings helped them to cope with their ill relative and 95% approved the multi-family format.

Conclusions: Non-specific aspects of the intervention were seen as the most useful part of the programme. An important target of treatment would be to improve the way in which the specific psychoeducational components are delivered to individuals with low formal education.

First published on August 26, 2009
International Journal of Social Psychiatry 2009, doi:10.1177/0020764009102754


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?