Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rose, D.
Right arrow Articles by Schofield, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rose, D.
Right arrow Articles by Schofield, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Perceptions of User Involvement: A User-Led Study

Diana Rose1*, Pete Fleischmann2, and Peter Schofield3

1 Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, London, UK
2 Social Care Institute for Excellence, London, London, UK
3 King’s College London School of Medicine, London, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: d.rose{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk.


   Abstract

Background: User involvement in health services has been a priority for govern-ment since 1990. In mental health, concern has been expressed that involved service users (activists) are not representative of ‘ordinary’ patients.

Aims: (i) To investigate service users’ perceptions of the outcomes of user involve-ment in two London boroughs. (ii) To determine whether the perceptions of outcomes differ between activists and non-activists.

Method: The study was user-led. The user-researchers compiled a semi-structured interview schedule which they then administered to a sample of 40 people; 20 were defined as activists and 20 as non-activists. There were also 20 participants in each borough.

Results: Activists were aware of more user groups and forms of user involve-ment than non-activists. However, in terms of perceptions of the outcomes of user involvement, there was little difference between the activists and non-activists.

Discussion: There is very little extant work on the outcomes of user involvement in mental health services. This study examined this and, contrary to reservations often expressed, there was little difference between activists and non-activists.

Conclusion: This is a pilot study. Further work should examine perceptions of the outcomes of user involvement by other stakeholders, for example, front-line workers, managers, carers and commissioners.

First published on July 23, 2009
International Journal of Social Psychiatry 2009, doi:10.1177/0020764009106618


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?